This article first appeared on Washington Post's "On Faith" Blog.
Everyone seems to be going green these days, even a growing number in the faith community. A recent Sierra Club survey reported that 67 percent of Americans said they care about the earth because it is "God's creation," a figure that has prompted many secular environmental groups to begin reaching out to the faithful. But does the environmental movement need the faith community or are green groups better off setting their own agenda and going it alone?
Many respected environmentalists recognize the role faith must play in the conversation. Edward O. Wilson, a famed scientist and Pulitzer Prize-winning environmentalist, penned "The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth," a book that was written to a fictitious Southern Baptist pastor. Wilson believes that pastors may be the key to solving our problems. I think he is more right than he realizes. The environmental movement cannot afford to overlook America's faith community for several reasons:
- A compelling narrative. Max Oelschlaeger, a professor at North Texas University who teaches philosophy of ecology, has written, "There are no solutions for the systemic causes of ecocrisis, at least in democratic societies, apart from religious narrative." Christianity, for example, tells the story of a God who creates everything, calls it "good," buries the revelation of his character inside of nature, and then explicitly asks humankind to care for it and preserve it. That's why a recent editorial in Christianity Today declared, "The Bible is not the enemy of the environmental cause, but its greatest asset." A story in which God asks human beings to do something is hard to beat.
- More evocative language. Tapping into religious narrative gives environmental groups access to authoritative language. As Immanuel Kant pointed out, religious language is moral discourse. It helps us talk about God's intentions for good behavior. Such talk enables environmentalists to up the ante by utilizing the language of goodness, sin and repentance.
- Mobilized communities. The key to any movement is the ability to motivate many people with as little effort as possible. Every Sunday, millions of faithful gather in houses of worship across America. These networks are already in place and, in many cases, have sophisticated ways of disseminating information. If these communities catch a vision for earth's restoration, the stewardship message will reach more people with less effort.
- Powerful voting bloc. Religion is influential in America, if for no other reason, due to their sheer numbers. Unfortunately for green advocates, these groups have not been significantly swayed by environmental concerns. According to a 2008 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, nearly 90 percent of Americans described themselves as religious, but only 21 percent report being active in the environmental movement.
This disconnect might be explained by the environmental movement's seeming unwillingness to forge solutions that appeal to the more conservative religious voting bloc. If the green crowd wants to capture the hearts of America's faithful--and they need to--they must begin looking for common ground solutions. There is a difference between cooperating with people of faith and co-opting them. Environmentalists must respect their convictions and honor their need for a varied set of conditions and principles.
The environmental movement clearly needs the faith community, but there is another side to the conversation: the faith community also needs to engage the environmental conversation. As everyday folks become aware of the devastation caused by global environmental problems, the credibility of faith communities are on the line. When believers respond to pressing problems with blind political partisanship and callousness, their public witness is damaged; when they begin living selfless lives of awareness and advocacy, the public is persuaded. As Mama used to say, "actions speak louder than words."
The environmental movement needs the narrative, language and people of America's faith community to begin making real progress. At the same time, believers need to validate the viability of their faith by living externally focused lives that show love for the Creator's handwork and the people who depend on it. If environmentalists and religious communities begin cooperating in ways that preserve their respective core values, it might just be a match made in heaven.

Order a copy of my new book, Green Like God: Unlocking the Divine Plan to Our Planet
Ed Darrell said:
Does the faith movement need environmentalism, if only as a measure of how rational and practical it is, if not for the discipline in faith it requires?
Posted: May 12, 2010
Debbie said:
My friend, I fear you have been mislead and are heading down a slippery slope. The separation of church and state is vital for our religious freedom. A partnership between the church and the government (EPA) in the name of "creation care" is a perversion of truth... and is a dangerous path. I see you like Al Moehler, he has several audio files where he has dealt with this topic. I am saying a prayer for you now that you eyes will be opened to this danger . . . The Progressives in power in our country are actively looking for deceptive ways to get evangelical christians involved so they can infiltrate our churches. I am sad to see you falling prey to their tactics. RESEARCH the progressive movement, the socialists, the eugenicists and marxists who currently hold power in our country. I dare you to prove me wrong... the lives you influence in this country depend on you knowing the truth.
Posted: May 19, 2010
Jonathan Merritt said:
Debbie,
Pertaining the separation of church and state, I am not talking about government needing the institution of the church. That is a different conversation. This article was about environmental organizations and the benefits of partnering with people of faith.
I think we should be very careful about progressive co-opting Church into some political movement. In fact, I alluded to that in my article. Similarly, we should be afraid of having conservative politicians and lobbying groups co-opt the the Church. The Church should not be the handmaiden of any political faction or secular movement.
Jm
Posted: May 19, 2010
Debbie said:
Jonathan, thanks for the reply. I have actually visited the website you started called creationcare.org and read the declaration, which actually calls for churches to begin actively preaching, promoting and practicing creation care. I don't believe that is in the great commission. Also, I also see that you have served on the President's Environment and Climate Change Task Force... do you not see a conflict here?
Posted: May 19, 2010
Jonthan Merritt said:
Debbie,
My declaration is at BaptistCreationCare.org. Nonetheless, we need to ask if the Great Commission is PART of our responsibility or ALL of our responsibility as faithful Christians. Protecting unborn babies is also not overtly part of the Great Commission. Should we also not preach, promote, or practice the sanctity of life?
Furthermore, I serve on the President's Taskforce just as Frank Page, former President of the SBC and now President of the SBC's Executive Committee, serves on the Faith Council that oversees the taskforce. I see NO problem with people of faith providing their insights as part of the political process. I have been clear that if I was ever asked to endorse a policy with which I had a moral conflict, I would resign. It was explained to me at that time--and has since proved true--that this taskforce is not a policy taskforce. It is simply a collection of faith leaders who roundtable issues and produce an advisory report on the faith perspective. I not only think this is right, I think this is necessary. People of faith can't influence culture if we aren't willing to take a seat at the table.
Jm
Posted: May 19, 2010
Debbie said:
Hi again - There are many different types of stewardship... comparing the sanctity of life of an unborn baby to that of a tree or the environment is absurd. Yes, I have already seen that Frank Page is involved as well... Of course your taskforce is NOT a policy taskforce... it is simply a group of pawns (some unwitting, others fully knowing the truth) that will be used to infiltrate and get their claws into our churches. People of faith absolutely CAN INFLUENCE culture without taking a seat at the government table... its been happening for 2,000 years..... Jonathan, please research, please reconsider what you are getting involved in.
Posted: May 19, 2010
Debbie said:
Another question, I saw Johnny Hunt's name on your list of signatories to the "declaration" at BaptistCreationCare.org..... did he read every word of the declaration and understand exactly what it entails before signing this?
Posted: May 19, 2010
Jonathan Merritt said:
Debbie,
I never made the comparison between the life of an unborn baby and the life of a tree. I was simply pointing out the fallacy of your insinuation that if it is not a part of the Great Commission, then Christians should not be preaching, practicing, or promoting it. The fact is that there are many things we should be practicing and promoting as Christians that are not explicitly part of the Great Commission. That's why God gave us the whole Bible and not just the last chapter of Matthew.
I'm not going to respond to your ad hominem characterization and generalization that people of faith who offer their opinions in the political process are "pawns." It's simply not intelligent or profitable dialogue.
Furthermore, I never said that people of faith cannot influence culture without sitting at the government table. That was another mischaracterization of yours. (I am starting to see a pattern). What I did say is "People of faith can't influence culture if we aren't willing to take a seat at the table." I stand by that. I believe we need to be speaking truth into culturally influential arenas--from business to community organizations, from the media to the arts, from the government to institutions of higher learning. You don't have to agree with me on this point or others I have made.
Jm
Posted: May 19, 2010
debbie said:
Jon, I am a sister in Christ and I love you as a brother in Christ. Why are you speaking to me so condescendingly? I have a son your age and I recognize when you are trying to one up me with attitude and big words... seen it before. Won't work. I am NOT writing you to argue or simply to confront.
Jon, I am NOT GENERALIZING that people of faith who offer their opinions in the political process are pawns. I am SPECIFICALLY stating that in this instance, YOU ARE sitting at a SPECIFIC table... at a SPECIFIC time in our History. At THIS TABLE they talk about preaching the GREEN GOSPEL from our pulpits to our congregations... sharing the GREEN message among our church members...They want you to believe your involvement is helpful and innocent... I' m sure it makes you feel important to share your opinions among these LEADERS.. Jon you are being used... YOU SPECIFICALLY ARE A PAWN... they are playing your song and you like singing it. PLEASE JON, PRAY, FAST AND PRAY, SEEK GOD'S FACE... TELL HIM YOU WANT ONLY HIS TRUTH... you will impact so many things you are not yet aware of... God Bless You Brother...I sincerely mean that. In His Name, Debbie
Posted: May 19, 2010
Jonathan Merritt said:
Debbie,
I was not intending to speak condescendingly to you. I hope that is not how you read my words.
I am sorry that we don't agree. Your language is wrapped in assumptions and I can't address them all here. For example, you speak about the "green gospel." I have never said that the gospel is green, and quite frankly, I have never been a part of a theological conversation with anyone who has attempted to make that point. In fact, my book specifically builds a case against the fad "green movement." If you haven't read it, I would invite you to do so. You'll learn more about my thinking and be able to evaluate the scriptures I offer for consideration.
Again and again, you speak as if you have special insight into the hearts and motives of others. You seem to know what everyone at "the table" thinks, what "songs" are being sung, who "likes singing" them, who is a pawn, and who is using whom. You seem to have everything figured out and have not come for dialogue, but only to be heard. So I have heard your point of view and I happen to disagree with it. You seem very sincere and passionate.
I will take your advice to continually seek the Lord's faith and wisdom.
Jm
Posted: May 19, 2010
Debbie said:
Jon, I want you to understand something. I am not someone who goes around looking for websites and blogs to BE HEARD on. I am usually heard on Facebook sharing pictures of my grand children and adopted Chinese children... and pleading the cause of orphans. Today, the Lord guided me on a path that led to you. I had no idea you existed until a few hours ago. I shared with you what God put on my heart. Jon, I am going to continue to pray for you. One last time, I beg you, don't be led astray by those in the Environmental Movement. If you always look to God and set your own thoughts and desires aside.. HE WILL SHOW YOU TRUTH, IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT. God Bless You, son. Debbie
Posted: May 19, 2010
Phil Wood said:
I've only just discovered your site today and so come late to this thread. Reflecting on this exchange makes me look again at my own context - Mennonite, British, Green Party Member, born Manchester UK, divorced, two lovely daughters, etc. It's a deep and complex mystery why people can look at the same Bible and the same world and see quite different things. In the UK we have our own hang up's about church and state but they aren't the same ones as you wrestle with. The Church of England clings to an increasingly discredited Constantinian relationship with the state, which year by year comes a little bit closer to abolition. Most churches here would support ecological responsibility. We don't feel the need to distance ourselves from the secular Green Movement by calling it 'Creation Care'. This is increasingly a deeply secular society where Christians are struggling to find a new and prophetic voice on the margins. I'm very much involved in the tiny Mennonite and Neo-Anbaptist constituency here, which brings its own challenges. Our congregations supports Eco-congregation, a format that many UK churches have adopted to shape environmental responsibility. The contrast between a tree and a person is a false dichotomy. A planet with many trees and rich biodiversity also supports human life.
Posted: May 23, 2010
Jonathan Merritt said:
Phil,
Thanks for the perspective you bring. I think we need more international voices tempering our "Americanism" and giving us another lens to look through.
The only thing I would say is that I don't use creation care because it distances us from the environmental movement. I used the term creation care because it is more accurate theologically and true to who I am. I don't care for an "environment" but rather I tend the Creator's garden.
Best to you.
Jm
Posted: May 23, 2010
Kristie Bullington said:
Jonathan, we need God's armor and the strength of Jesus to do ALL that we need to do as Christians. We have a great responsibility to respect all of God's creations... God's way NOT the government’s way!!!! So while we live in this world we do need to participate even in government issues with the word of God to guide us! Thanks Jonathan
Posted: May 25, 2010