"Praying for @johnnyswim and their loss. "Even if I walk through the valley of the shadow of death..." Ps. 23" 11 minutes ago
Follow Me

America is Exceptional, But I'm Not an Exceptionalist

Posted November 30, 2010 Tags: America, politics

This article was originally published on The Washington Post "On Faith" blog.

I believe America is exceptional, but I am not an "American exceptionalist." The former is rooted in facts, and the latter in bad theology.

America is special for many reasons. We are the most charitable country in the world. Each year, Americans voluntarily donate hundreds of billions of dollars to churches, non-profits, and humanitarian agencies. We are the freest country in the world. Americans can worship whatever god they choose whenever they choose, and no one can force his wife to cover her face in public.  The conditions are better in America. Unlike much of the world, clean water is a readily available commodity and the average wage is much higher than most of the world.

The politically correct police might have us believe that all countries are exceptional in their own way. But such assertions are thin and meaningless. They're reminiscent of a scene from The Incredibles in which the mother says, "Everyone's special" and the son replies, "which is another way of saying no one is."

The facts are indisputable: America is not only different, we are exceptional. That's why countries look to us when drafting constitutions and forming governments. That's why we spend so much time debating immigration, not emigration. This is a wonderful place to live, and many citizens of other nations are clamoring to come here while our citizens largely stay put.

At the same time, I do not consider myself an American exceptionalist because of the poor theology that is so often enmeshed with the paradigm. Many who comprise the religious right have long held that America has somehow achieved special standing with God. Working on a fundamental beliefs that obedience to God brings blessings and disobedience brings curses and rooted in several false beliefs, these thinkers believe we've earned God's blessings through historical obedience. This is rooted in several false beliefs, such as America being founded as a "sacred Christian nation" and the misapplication of Old Testament passages addressing ancient Israel to modern America.

Just as the America-is-a-dime-a-dozen paradigm falls flat in the face of facts, so these beliefs don't stand up to historical and hermeneutical scrutiny. For this reason--as former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson points out in his new book, City of Man: Religion and Politics in a New Era--the biggest problem of the religious right is not tonal or strategic, but theological.

The difference in believing that America is exceptional and American exceptionalism is significant. Believing that America is exceptional recognizes that our blessings--like every good and perfect gift--come from God. It emphasizes God's grace rather than America's greatness.  The latter assumes that our nation has claimed favored status with God and often yields a don't-you-wish-you-were-like-us attitude. That's why Michael Kinsley of Politico defines exceptionalism as "the theory that Americans are better than everybody else."

Why is this important? Accepting that America is exceptional due to God's unmerited favor breeds the virtues of gratitude and humility. A belief that America is the recipient of divine favoritism, on the other hand, breeds arrogance and triumphalism. But what many fail to recognize is that pervasive arrogance robs one of any claims to being exceptional. Instead of beating our chests and bragging, we should bow our heads in humble gratitude to the grace-giver.

-----

 

Order a copy of my new book, Green Like God: Unlocking the Divine Plan to Our Planet

 

Cara Reynolds said:

I agree with you. Jesus came to serve, not to be served. God loves us all and wants us to love others equally. We should be grateful to God for what we have.

Posted: December 1, 2010

Justin said:

I'd fact check that assertion about being the freest country.

Posted: December 2, 2010

JUSTIN said:

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=ranking+freest+countries&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=7dfdc6456fc445ab

Posted: December 2, 2010

Mike said:

I think the caricature of "religious right" views of American exceptionalism are a bit overblown. The idea that God is active in the affairs of man and judges nations even today is hardly controversial in Christian thought, nor is it dangerous, as you imply.

The claim that this general view resulted in wide-spread theological and political arrogance among conservative Christians is, like many critiques of the religious right, more about innuendo than facts, and, more importantly, about 30 years too late. The religious right is no longer an organized political movement. You are simply beating back shadows of what might have been in very limited worst-case scenerios, as opposed to actually engaging the beliefs of what most religious conservatives actually believed back in the days of Moral Majority and Christian Coalition. Or, most importantly, today.

If the trend to ultra-exceptionalism has been a problem with conservatives, the exact opposite has been a problem for the Christian and non-Christian left, which believes that America is a greedy environmental polluter and the source of many of our world's foreign policy problems.

As no President in modern history better exemplifies left-wing ideology than President Obama, a more relevant issue for consideration is whether the darling of the Christian left actually believes that America is exceptional, and I mean what he believes in private, not what he says in front of a teleprompter. His need to conduct a year-long overseas apology tour (and his speech in Germany, 2008) may provide some insight into answering that question.

Posted: December 22, 2010

Jonathan Merritt said:

Mike,

As someone who lives, works, and serves in the center of evangelical America, I respectfully disagree. I attended Liberty University where my education was personally paid for by Falwell. I graduated in 2004, not thirty years ago. I graduated from a Southern Baptist seminary in 2006. I serve as a teaching pastor at a large, conservative Southern Baptist church in Atlanta. I've had dozens of conversations with leaders currently serving in this arena on this topic, which seems consistent with recent polling by PRR, Pew, LifeWay, Ellison, Greenberg, and Barna. So my perspective is rooted in this credible sampling.

This post was not about Barack Obama's views on American exceptionalism, but I agree that there is room for dialog in that space.

Jm

Posted: December 22, 2010

Darren Maybee said:

See Jonathan. Like Mike said above you are on the wrong track. It serves no purpose to put down the great Christians in our past to further whatever your agenda is. You are using the terms "Christians" and "evangelicals" so freely but you have watered them down. I don't know what you truly believe. And for your "Green Like God" book, global warming or the latest liberal term "climate change" is just a lie. You are trying to play both sides of the fence and it won't work. If you guys are "The Next Christians" then we are in serious trouble.

Posted: December 23, 2010

Jonathan Merritt said:

Darren,

First of all, you speak out of ignorance. You pass judgment on my book because of "global warming or the latest liberal term 'climate change.'" But this only proves you have not read the book. If you had, you'd know that I don't address climate change except in the respectively small second appendix. Since you are speaking out of ignorance here, I'm not going to comment further on that. I would however encourage you to actually read those materials you wish to critique (this includes "The Next Christians" since you also reference that book, but clearly have not read it either). As a student of the Bible, I think this falls under what it means to love the Lord your God with your "mind." Additionally, I'd say this falls under your responsibility to season your speech with the wisdom of which Solomon spoke copiously.

You also made a comment that I "put down the great Christians in our past." I didn't mention anyone in this post, so I can only infer that you're referring to another post made at another time. Because your term "put down" is so vague, I am unsure how to respond. If you mean that public figures who may have made public comments should now be "off limits" for reasonable critique simply because they were "Christian," then I would respectfully disagree. But judging by other comments you have made at QIdeas.org, what you actually mean is that Christians can only be critiqued if they are "liberal" or adhere to what you term "the social gospel" (I have serious doubts based on your comments that you even fully understand this term). If, on the other hand, Christians hail from your particular Christian community, then they should not be critiqued.

This is a dubious standard to which you yourself fail to adhere. It is illustrated in the way you spoke to / about a Christian leader by name in your QIdeas.org comment (which is above all else a violation of Matthew 18 since you claim to know this person).

I would encourage you to do your homework before you comment in a public forum--for your own sake as well as the sake of other commenters.

Jm

Posted: December 23, 2010

Leave a Response
© 2012 Jonathan Merritt. All Rights Reserved. Site Map Contact