There is a growing belief among many that perhaps there are numerous ways to get to heaven outside of the Christian gospel. I have called it "The Rising Tide of Universalism," and I think we need to be talking about it. Recently, I published an article in Relevant Magazine exploring this phenomenon and I am bringing the conversation to you in a three part post entitled, "Is Jesus the Only Way?"
In 2002, Bishop Carlton Pearson was the epitome of success in the Christian world. His South Tulsa megachurch, Higher Dimensions Family Church, boasted more than 6,000 members, he served on the board of trustees at Oral Roberts University, he was a guest host on the Trinity Broadcast Network and he was one of a few black religious leaders advising President Bush. That was before he discovered “the Gospel of Inclusion.”
Pearson began preaching that Christ’s death provided salvation for everyone and that no one will spend eternity tormented in hell. While this message may sound sweet to some, his church family was not so accepting. Over the last few years, his congregation has diminished to a few hundred faithful, his church buses have been banned from the ORU campus and his church property has been lost to foreclosure.
Bishop Pearson is not alone. A recent Pew Study, for example, found that “70 percent of Americans with a religious affiliation say that many religions—not just their own—can lead to eternal life.” And in a more specific study, LifeWay Research asked a niche of Protestant churchgoers whether they believed a person could obtain eternal life through “religions other than Christianity.” Shockingly, 31 percent of respondents still agreed.
Universalism, or the belief that everyone will eventually be reconciled to God, is neither new nor novel. Early church fathers like Origen and Clement of Alexandria held to universal salvation, although it was later deemed heresy at the fifth ecumenical council in 553 AD. In America, founding fathers like Benjamin Rush also held to this view, and did so without apology. Rush once said, “A belief in God’s universal love to all his creatures, and that he will finally restore all of them that are miserable to happiness, is a polar truth.” Today, you might find the theological descendants of Origen and Rush in a Universalist Church.
“True Christianity is not so much about doctrines that we believe in. It is about following the way of Jesus,” says Eric Stetson, Executive Director of the Christian Universalist Association (CUA) and author of Christian Universalism: God’s Good News for All People. “A Buddhist, Hindu or Muslim may not see Christ the same way, but if they live in a way that reflects Christ—even if they don’t know Him—it will affect their eternal fate.” These people may be called 'anonymous Christians.'”
Hell is, surprisingly, a real place in Stetson’s view, although he nervously avoids using that word. “We believe there is an afterlife, and we do believe there is a reality of judgment of punishment for sin because we reap what we sow. But ultimately, every person will come into harmony with God at some point,” he says. “God’s anger doesn’t last forever. It is His mercy that endures forever.”
Stetson is an ordained Charismatic minister, and on his board of directors sit people from various denominations, including the United Church of Christ, Southern Baptist Convention and several charismatic traditions. More than a third of the members of his association are ordained ministers and local church leaders. They have come together to unite around one thing: “the universal salvation of all people and the all-inclusive love of God.”
Do you know anyone who holds to universal salvation? Do you believe everyone will eventually make it? What about devout Hindus/Buddhists/Muslims who are "good people" but aren't "Christians?
Amber Luchterhand said:
I believe there is only one way to Heaven- through faith in Jesus Christ. I do know people who can't bring themselves to believe that God would be so cruel as to not include everyone in his Salvation. My response to these people is that God does wish to include everyone. He sent Jesus to die for all of our sins. We only have to accept that and put our trust in him.
Being a "good" Muslim or Hindu isn't enough. "For it is by grace we are saved, through faith and not of ourselves..."
And yes God's mercy is great, but it does not extend forever. Revelation makes it very clear that there will come a time for judgment, when it is too late to ask for mercy.
I can see how people fall into this idea that everyone will be forgiven and will go to Heaven. It's a nice thought. It's just not right.
Posted: November 16, 2009
Blake said:
I've been in very rigorous debates with "Christian universalists." I've accepted a kind of intolerant "Don't ask, don't tell" policy with them.
First, let me describe my own "tolerance" of them. I won't say that they are wrong. What I will say is that I completely disagree with them. I will also say that it is up to God to decide who makes it into Heaven.
My intolerance comes in with how I respond to them in the context of the church which is to not cooperate with any Christians that are determined to share that part of their beliefs. They are gambling with souls at the cost of an eternity in hell and I personally suspect the stakes are stacked against them being right. Thus, the "don't ask, don't tell" comes in where I don't mind working with "Christian universalists" so long as they keep it to themselves and don't represent the church with their beliefs in the mission field.
Posted: November 16, 2009
Mike Waggoner said:
I remember this article...I loved it!
It was what prompted me to get in touch with you.
The difficulty I have with universalism is not the idea that God loves everyone so much that it would go against who He is to send rejectors to hell...the problem is, that Jesus spoke often, in no uncertain terms, of a real hell. How can these folks dismiss the teachings of the very One they say they follow?
Posted: November 17, 2009
Grady Bauer said:
There is much in Scripture that is open to interpretation....but not this. When Jesus said "I am the way...no one comes to Father but by me" that pretty much summed it up.
The difficult aspect of this comes when you befriend devout members of other faiths. I have dear friends that are good Muslims...doing their best, with their world-view to understand who God is. It's difficult to comprehend that their attempts at being good with limited knowledge will exclude them from spending eternity with God...but it will.
Posted: November 17, 2009
Andrew Courtright said:
Here is my question, why as christians do we consume so much time and energy debating topics such as this? If it truly is God's decision who is allowed in to the new heavens and new earth why does it seem like we are trying to decide for God who is "in" and who is "out?" How do conversations like this improve my relationship with God? What are the implications for how I live now and for how I love others? If universalism is true, does that change anything?
Posted: November 17, 2009
Amanda V. said:
This is tough. Not because I'm not sure what I believe, but because it can come across very narrow-minded.
I agree with Grady in quoting John 14:6. It's pretty specific. Not very much wiggle room. I also believe that just because someone is sincere in what they believe, that does not necessarily make them right. You can be sincere and whole-heartedly believe the wrong thing. Sincerity does not equal correctness. However, I do believe that God is not only holy but just. He is holy, which is why He cannot tolerate sin, but He is just, which is why I believe that someone who lived and died without ever hearing the name of Christ will receive more mercy than someone who grew up in a Christian nation (not necessarily the US) and rejected several opportunities to accept Christ. Along those lines, I truly believe that God will reveal Himself (either through nature, missionaries, or whatever means He deems appropriate) to a person He sees is earnestly seeking the Truth. The Bible is clear that "if you seek, you will find" (Matthew 7:7).
Posted: November 17, 2009
Steve said:
It is an interesting question, right up there with the Age of Understanding one (what about people who have never heard of Jesus / too young to understand?), and I think it has similar implications. For instance, it seems unfair to punish those who have never heard with an eternity in hell in the same light that it seems unfair to punish those with "the odds stacked against them" like those from devout Muslim / Jewish communities.
However, if those who haven't heard are home free, then why don't we all just lock ourselves in a room and never speak about Jesus?
It is for this reason that many missionaries I know are very opposed to that concept.
This is very much a complicated faith / story logic problem. We are supposed to believe that everyone is given a fair opportunity to come to Christ (because God can be nothing but Just), however conversion rates are much lower in places such as the Middle East and Japan. Also, if God creates everyone with a purpose, certain documented personality traits or professions have a much lower percentage of professing Christians in their ranks. Personality is, to a large percentage, determined by genetics. This makes it seem very much so as though the odds are stacked.
Universalism would be a great feel-good answer to these problems, but the last thing we need is for Christianity to further merge with New Age concepts. I for one am thoroughly excited to learn these answers one day.
Posted: November 17, 2009
Jonathan Merritt said:
Mike,
I totally forgot about that. Glad we've stayed connected.
Jm
Posted: November 17, 2009
Jonathan Merritt said:
Andrew,
If the assertion that Jesus is the only way is to heaven is correct, then it matters supremely. I agree with you that we shouldn't waste time trying to determine who is "in" and who is "out." I have a feeling that there will be a lot of surprises about who is there and who isn't. But this is a different and important question, I think.
Jm
Posted: November 17, 2009
Jonathan Merritt said:
Amanda: Good thoughts. I bet there are many, many Christians who feel just like you do...including me.
Steve: I don't think we are seeing a merging of Christianity and New Ageism, but I think you do well to point out the logical problem with accepting that general revelation might be enough to "save" someone in a foreign country who has never heard about Christ. If that is enough, why should we tell anyone about Jesus and risk sending them to hell?
Jm
Posted: November 17, 2009
Steve said:
What I mean by a merging of Christianity and New Ageism is that as opposed to focusing on sound doctrine and Christian principles, people revert to more abstract concepts. You are probably aware of how frequently people put "GOD is LOVE" as their religious views, or people who in conversation refer to themselves as Christians, but then go on a spiritualist tangent.
It isn't overt, but more of a cultural pollution.
Posted: November 17, 2009
CJ said:
Jesus tells us that the road to destruction is broad, has a wide gate and is traveled by many, while the road to salvation is difficult/confined, has a narrow gate and few find it. In addition to claiming to be the way/truth/life/door to eternal life, He also defined eternal life as knowing the Father--the only true God--and Jesus Christ, Who was sent by the Father. Everyone is confronted with how he/she responds to this and the many other truth claims of Christ--did He say/teach it, and is it true? As to those who have "never heard," Paul tells us that no such person exists, and no one is without excuse. Do you believe that?
One of the unique aspects of Christianity is what the Bible teaches about the nature of man vs. the nature of God, why salvation is even necessary, and how salvation is offered.
Nature of man = depraved and evil, spiritually "dead in sin" and a "child of wrath" (Eph 2:1-3), and harbinger of a heart that is deceitfully wicked
Nature of God = holy, just, worthy of worship, love...much more
Why salvation is necessary = stems from the gap between man's and God's nature and man's inability to attain salvation through any effort of his own
How salvation is offered = not through the requirement of keeping certain laws/rules/religious practices/being "good" but through faith in the only One who can satisfy God's demand for holiness--a perfect, spotless propitiation (substitute) who transfers His perfection to those who trust in Him, and in return, takes on their filth and and pays (paid) the penalty for that filth with the purchase price of His blood, the only thing that will satisfy God's requirement of holiness ("be holy as He is holy" -- Mt. 5:48)
Universalism doesn't hold a candle to God's redemptive plan to redeem and reconcile the world unto Himself, free the captives and loose the chains of our natural state, much less the promise of eternal salvation. We don't deserve salvation; we aren't entitled to it nor can we do anything to earn it. Instead of focusing on the holiness of God, Universalism holds to a faulty view of love and mercy and ascribes humankind to some eternal entitlement that simply doesn't exist.
Posted: November 17, 2009
Dave said:
If the only way is through Jesus, then what about those who lived and died before him, yet had good relationships with God? And what about those, through no fault of their own, who have died after Jesus was on earth, but did not hear the word? One could argue in today's world, everyone should have at least heard about Jesus, but what about 200 years ago?
Posted: November 19, 2009
Azariah Southworth said:
I agree with Eric Stetson. There are people who live their entire lives without knowing who Jesus is, but they understand love, forgiveness, sacrifice and grace. They understand and practice what Christ teaches us to practice... Mark 12:30-31.
It's so easy for us, coming from our privileged Christian backgrounds, to sit in our mega-churches every Sunday and condemn anyone who does not profess Christ. Some of the most Christ-like people I've ever met call themselves atheist.
Posted: November 19, 2009